+rep I trust her on the server.She has no motive to abuse and everyone basically likes her.Staff should be liked and be fun among the community,which is what she does.In the test,she did not do the best,but she didn't give up in that last hard question.With proper training from me or amf(amf most likely since he wants to train somebody),she will be a fine staff member.
===The Test===
Jam In The Jukebox: Introduction: Okay,this is a test to test your basic knowledge over common scenarios that occur on the server.As a staff member,YOU WILL SEE THESE SCENARIOS.We will start off easy and get harder.Now,if you truly do consider yourself ready and "confident",DO NOT LOOK AT MOTD AT ANY TIME OF THE TESTING.You have 1-2 minutes per question except when the rounds are changing.If you take too long MORE THAN ONCE,it WILL be counted AGAINST you.However,if your answer is LONG,it will be allowed you take more than 1-2 minutes.
kimz-a-unicorn: I'm still nervous but ok
Jam In The Jukebox: Scenario 1:A traitor kills his fellow traitor buddy with a c4.The victim reports his killer and you are now handling the report.What will be your decision?Give a slay or not.
kimz-a-unicorn: Well first I want to know if the t that planted the c4 wanred the other t's
kimz-a-unicorn: or if they just had that little c4 logo
kimz-a-unicorn: as their only warning
Jam In The Jukebox: Every c4 has a c4 logo
kimz-a-unicorn: i know what I'm wondering is if they used traitor chat to warn each other
kimz-a-unicorn: cause if they did they I wouldn't slay but if they didnt I would give 1 slay
kimz-a-unicorn: cause I know t's get slays for not warning their other t's about the nether trap on b5
Jam In The Jukebox: Isn't the c4 logo enough of a warn?
kimz-a-unicorn: I suppose but personally I'm a spazz as a t
kimz-a-unicorn: so I appreciate the extra warnings
Jam In The Jukebox: You don't slay for c4 kills ever buddy
kimz-a-unicorn: Now I know
Jam In The Jukebox: Scenario 2:You witness your BEST friend,who'm has never played gmod before, false kosing.What is your response as a fellow trial mod?
kimz-a-unicorn: I have to explain to them what kosing and false kosing is and I would give them the slay for it, but I would also make sure that they understand what it is so it doesnt happen again, regardless of my relationship with this person rules are rules
Jam In The Jukebox: Scenario 3:Your friend vinz pegasus found a new glitch in minecraft_b5 and he asks you to come over and help him do it.What is your response as a fellow trial mod.
kimz-a-unicorn: I wont help them, and tell them not to do it because I know thats a ban, I dont want anyone to get banned if it can be prevented but if they do it I have to ban them
Jam In The Jukebox: Scenario 4:You see someone with an attitude taking their anger out on others on the server because they are treated like crap.What do you do?
kimz-a-unicorn: are they rdming or just being rude over chat etc? cause the rdming obviously gets slays, the mic spam and rudeness etc I would mute them or gag them and verbally explain to them that they are being rude, if once I ungagged them they continued I would warn them formally, and possibly ban for disrepect
Jam In The Jukebox: Scenario 5:You witness 2 staff members fighting,would you rather:
1:Remind them of their moral principles on the server
2:remind them that staff are to be proactive rather than reactive
3:Try to end the fight by joining a side.
4:Review their motives to argue and reveal the truth.
BE SURE TO EXPLAIN WHY YOUR CHOICE IS SUPERIOR TO OTHERS AND WHAT THE OTHERS LACK AS THE RIGHT CHOICE.BE CREATIVE WITH YOUR RESPONSE.
kimz-a-unicorn: assuming I can only choose 1 I would do 4 I would use my access to the logs to look into what specifically happened in combination with the rules of the server and collect the facts. I would talk to each of them about their opinions of what happened and show them what I have found. Picking a side in an argument won't help because it will only involve me in a fight that doesn't need to happen in the first place. Reminding the staff of their responsibilities and principles is important but it can make a situation worse, and that can happen after the fight and problem itself is resolved. I would prefer to avoid a fight to begin with though. It's important to remember that the staff are people with thoughts and feelings and they need to respect each other as much as they need to respect the players on the server.
Jam In The Jukebox: Scenario 6(THE PEOPLE MENTIONED IN THIS SCENARIO WERE NEVER INVOLVED IN IT NOR DID THEY COMMIT ANY SUCH CRIME SAID,BUT THIS QUESTION ASKS FOR AN "IF" THEY DID.BASICALLY,THIS SCENARIO WAS FORGED,IT NEVER HAPPENED,BUT IT DOESN'T STOP IT FROM SOMETHING SIMILAR HAPPENING.)
***Map:Haven***
4 people are rdmd by a new user by a tnt.They report it and 2 of the reporters HIGHLY offend the reported player in the report.What would you do and why?
*** Evidence of the scenario(Autopsy Report)***
On august 1st,4 people were killed by a tnt.A traitor,innox3.The person who apparantly set off the tnt is "Funless" who was accused of shooting the tnt when everyone died by "something/world" at exactly 1 minute into the round.
*shot logs*
00:54 - funless has shot with weapon_ttt_g3
00:55 - TheRipper has shot with ptp_cs_galil
00:55 - TheRipper has shot with ptp_cs_galil
00:55 - TheRipper has shot with ptp_cs_galil
00:55 - TheRipper has shot with ptp_cs_galil
00:55 - funless has shot with weapon_ttt_g3
00:55 - TheRipper has shot with ptp_cs_galil
01:00 - Amf has shot with ptp_cs_galil
***Funless was a t THE LAST ROUND before his "rdm",he killed victim 2 and 4 before being killed by amf.***
Reported player's response to all the reports: I thought you were a t because you did nothing in the gun fight.
Jam In The Jukebox: Victim 1: funless shot the tnt! He was the only person who could have! I was standing and then all of a sudden funless and the ripper had a gun fight then ripper moved toward me, running away,and I tried to move back but I think I pushed something then funless shot the tnt behind me.The tnt was way off way off ripper!I Think he did it on purpose!
Victim 2:I was afk then all of a sudden I am dead.You want decisive proof? when I used !report it said "killer" on his name! He killed me! I Request a slay be put on him!
Victim 3:I was a t,but he had no right to kill me!Funless just shot me outta nowhere claiming he had "dna" but thats BS.HE AINT A DETECTIVE!NOW HE GOES TO RDM 3 OTHER INNOS AND ME BY SHOOTING THE TNT TO GET HIS "kill" HOPE IT WAS WORTH 5 SLAYS YOU RDMR
Victim 4:I dunno,I was just standing then This guy just came and just went ape shit and then shot the FREAKIN TNT.When I used !report it said I was killed by him.SO STUPID.
A trial mod accused amf of shooting the tnt because he was the only one who shot at 1 minute.However amf at the death scene was scene at the ship.No vantage point at the ship could reach the tnt.
Who is the real culprit???
kimz-a-unicorn: Well I would ask the 2 reporters that offened the reported player not to use offensive language. Also if Amf shot last wouldn't that mean that he shot the tnt not the T, so these reports could be false because they reported the wrong person. (In all honesty I have to work on my ability to understand the logs themselves) Also if the T did in fact blow up the tnt and no other t's were killed by the explosion it isn't rdm and the reports are false
kimz-a-unicorn: that question is hard for sure and I definitely need to work on reading the logs
Jam In The Jukebox: The t didn't blow up the tnt,his rdmr blew it up.\
kimz-a-unicorn: oh see I misunderstood
kimz-a-unicorn: I completely misunderstood/read this question
Jam In The Jukebox: ok
Jam In The Jukebox: Read it and tell me who did it
kimz-a-unicorn: I can be reading it completely wrong amf set it off
Jam In The Jukebox: want a hint?
kimz-a-unicorn: please!!
Jam In The Jukebox: The culprit is one of the victims.And it has to do with how the tnt blew up.Amf shot at the exact time it blew up,but it would've been impossible because amf wasn't near the cave
kimz-a-unicorn: ohhhhh that makes sense I still don't have a proper answer question because the log reading which I'm aware is a major part of this so I have to work on it for sure
Jam In The Jukebox: kkkkkk
kimz-a-unicorn: sorry :/
Jam In The Jukebox: about what
kimz-a-unicorn: that last question
Jam In The Jukebox: what 'bout it
kimz-a-unicorn: idk I'm sorry about my inablility to properly answer it
Jam In The Jukebox: I didn't expect you to answer it.Amf struggled at it,riddles rage quitted,cake gave up,and so on
kimz-a-unicorn: ohhhhhh
kimz-a-unicorn: But I don't know any of their locations in relation to any of the tnts
Jam In The Jukebox: they were all near the tnt except amf.That's why there were 4 victims
kimz-a-unicorn: ohhhhh hmmm
kimz-a-unicorn: did TheRipper do it it's possible that he was tbaiting because of all the shooting
kimz-a-unicorn: I dont wanna give up cause I feel like I can get it
Jam In The Jukebox: The ripper was the t.I told you he didn't do it.he was victim 2
Jam In The Jukebox: I mean victim 3 not 2
kimz-a-unicorn: so did funles actually do it
Jam In The Jukebox: No
Jam In The Jukebox: He claimed to be innocent
kimz-a-unicorn: it was someone else then who didnt shoot
kimz-a-unicorn: THEY DETONATED THE TNT WITHOUT SHOOTING
Jam In The Jukebox: You're getting close
kimz-a-unicorn: is innox3 a name and now I'm like going through my head of all the possible ways to detonate a tnt
Jam In The Jukebox: Inno x3 just means 3 innos
kimz-a-unicorn: ah hmmm so then I dont know the 4th persons name on here but it could have been a grenade or moving the tnt or a body hitting it
Jam In The Jukebox: You don't need to know their names
Jam In The Jukebox: And you got closer by "move"
kimz-a-unicorn: so if someone walks into the tnt by accident it can detonate because I have done that before
Jam In The Jukebox: so who
kimz-a-unicorn: does it matter who walked into it if it was an accident?
Jam In The Jukebox: Yes
Jam In The Jukebox: That's accidental rdm
kimz-a-unicorn: ok.
kimz-a-unicorn: was it one of the 2 whoses names i dont know if them were hiding in that tnt cave and tried to form a barricade if two people walked up while they were moving it 4 people would have died from it leaving the t and amf who killed him
Jam In The Jukebox: Yes
kimz-a-unicorn: wait really!?
Jam In The Jukebox: What
Jam In The Jukebox: I meant It was one of the people who didn't have names such as victim 3
kimz-a-unicorn: ok
kimz-a-unicorn: so victim 1 was the one moving the tnt then?
kimz-a-unicorn: I'm very confused but I refuse to give up
Jam In The Jukebox: Yes
Jam In The Jukebox: He couldn't move back since the tnt was behind him; he was pushing it.
kimz-a-unicorn: ohhhhhhhh see when I move the tnt it ALWAYS explodes
Jam In The Jukebox: Yeuhh
kimz-a-unicorn: I'm happy that I didnt quit
kimz-a-unicorn:
